A huge, dark brown, heavily built bear walking across a grassy steppe, seen from the side, with a pale, blunt muzzle, an impression of the giant short-faced bear of Ice Age North America.

Lost GiantsPleistocene

Short-faced bear

A bear with its shoulders at eye level, neither as short-faced nor as predatory as its reputation

From up to 1.9 million until about 12 800 years ago Reconstruction, not a photograph
Lived until about 12 800 years ago the species arose between 1.9 million and 850 000 years ago [1]
Shoulder height 1 to 1.67 m the largest males could look a person in the eye [1]
Standing height about 2.4 to 3.4 m vertical arm reach up to 4.3 m [1]
Weight about 625 kg on average estimates for six individuals run from 317 to 957 kg [1]
Sexes males up to twice the size of females large specimens genetically male, small ones female [6]
Range Alaska and the Yukon to Mexico east to Florida; only 109 finds as of 2010 [1]
Diet omnivore plants and varying amounts of meat [3]
Feet flat on the ground, toes pointing forward the tail was only a stub [8]
Named 1879, by Cope as Arctotherium simum, from Potter Creek Cave, California [1]
Gone from Beringia about 23 000 years ago from the dated fossils; Salis and colleagues (2025) say about 20 000 [1]

About the pictures. Skeletons and fossil tracks give the height, domed head, deep muzzle and long claws of the bear in four paintings: walking over a grassy steppe, standing at the edge of a misty pine wood, a head in close-up and wading a shallow river in Ice Age Alaska. The dark coat leans on hair from South Dakota described as black, curly and coarse, though one sample may not show the species' colour. The pale muzzle and forehead stripe are imagined. The skeleton suggests a shorter back and a lighter build than the walking and wading bears. The river scene can only belong before the species left Alaska, about 23 000 years ago on the dated fossils or about 20 000 in a 2025 paper.

Some individuals of the giant short-faced bear, Arctodus simus, may have been the largest land-dwelling members of the order Carnivora that ever lived in North America. The biggest males stood 1.67 m at the shoulder, tall enough to look a person in the eye, and the species ranged from Alaska and the Yukon to Mexico until about 12 800 years ago. For decades it was drawn as a long-legged, running super-predator. Research since 2010 has taken most of that image apart, including the short face in its name.

How big, and why the numbers disagree

On its hind legs it stood about 2.4 to 3.4 m, with an arm reach of up to 4.3 m. Weight is harder to pin down. A 1999 limb-bone study by Christiansen gave a mean of about 770 kg for large males. In 2010 Figueirido and colleagues estimated six specimens: three at 740 to 957 kg and three under 500 kg, the lightest at 317 kg. A 2006 study capped the species at about 555 kg from the largest known skull, while others have speculated about males of 1 000 to 1 200 kg. A species average of about 625 kg is often quoted.

Much of the spread has a simple cause: males could be twice the size of females. In 1967 Kurtén proposed that large and small bears were two subspecies, but a 2025 DNA study led by Salis, with 31 mitochondrial genomes, found no support for that. All seven large specimens it could sex were male, and all four small ones female.

It was still not the largest bear ever. Soibelzon and Schubert gave that title in 2011 to a South American relative, Arctotherium angustidens, from an old, injured male in Buenos Aires Province, likely 1 588 to 1 749 kg.

A face and legs that mislead

The 2010 study’s title ends “the ‘short-faced’ long-legged and predaceous bear that never was”. The face only looks short: the snout is deep and the nasal bones are short, so the face is deeper, not shorter, than in most living bears. The leggy look, the authors argued, comes largely from a short back and torso, since all bears are long-limbed under their fur and bulk. Others measure proportionally longer limb bones, though still stouter than a big cat’s.

Kurtén pictured a “running bear” that chased down horses and saiga. Its mass, stiff spine and flat-footed gait would have handicapped any such chase. Matheus proposed instead that the long limbs served efficient travel over great distances. Fossil trackways near Lakeview, Oregon, show long claws and front paws slightly larger than the hind, and one print from White Sands, New Mexico, measures 15 cm long and 19 cm wide.

What it really ate

Earlier ideas cast it as a hunter of big game, or as a specialised scavenger that drove other predators from their kills. Its teeth fit neither well. The carnassials are built for crushing and grinding, not shearing, and specimens from La Brea lack the wear of bone-crackers. Fossil dung from South Dakota and the Yukon contains juniper seeds.

It did eat meat, as nitrogen isotopes show, and large males may have eaten more of it. Figueirido’s team summed the animal up as “a colossal omnivore whose diet probably included varying amounts of meat”. Its closest living relative, the spectacled bear, is itself mostly vegetarian.

Gone from the north first

In Alaska and the Yukon, every dated fossil falls between about 50 000 and 23 000 years ago, which is why its disappearance from Beringia is usually put at about 23 000 years ago. Salis and colleagues, citing older work, give about 20 000 years. Either way, it never came back, and it apparently never reached Asia.

South of the ice it lasted thousands of years longer. The most reliable last date, about 12 800 years, comes from Huntington Dam in Utah. A vertebra from Bonner Springs in Kansas gives the same age, though another laboratory dated it younger, and a date of about 12 700 years from Friesenhahn Cave in Texas rests on degraded collagen.

The cause is unsettled. Proposals include the loss of large herbivores, poorer plant food as the climate shifted, competition with brown bears and people, and low genetic diversity. People certainly met the bear: trackways appear to cross at White Sands, and at Lubbock Lake in Texas, Clovis people butchered one about 13 000 years ago. There is no clear sign, though, that they drove it to extinction.

Where it sits in deep time

Short-faced bear: From up to 1.9 million until about 12 800 years ago, in the Pleistocene.

Short-faced bear

Earth forms, 4.57 billion years agoToday

Each step to the right is ten times closer to today, so the last few million years get as much room as the first billion.

If Earth's history were one day

Squeeze all of Earth's history, about 4.6 billion years, into 24 hours, starting at midnight. Short-faced bear runs from 23:59:24.1 to 23:59:59.76, ending 0.24 seconds before midnight.

On this clock one second is about 52 862 years. All of written history fits into the last tenth of a second.

How big

The largest males at the shoulder and standing on their hind legs, next to a person.

Reconstructions

A huge, dark brown, heavily built bear walking across a grassy steppe, seen from the side, with a pale, blunt muzzle, an impression of the giant short-faced bear of Ice Age North America. AI-generated painting.
A huge, long-legged dark brown bear standing at the edge of a misty pine woodland with its head raised to sniff the air, an impression of the giant short-faced bear of Ice Age North America. AI-generated painting.
Close-up of the head of a huge brown bear in profile, with a deep, blunt muzzle, a dark nose and small rounded ears, against blurred green grass and a pale sky, an impression of the giant short-faced bear of Ice Age North America. AI-generated painting.
A huge, dark brown bear wading through a shallow river, water splashing around its paws, golden grass and low hills beyond under a grey sky, an impression of a short-faced bear in Ice Age Alaska. AI-generated painting.

Questions people ask

How big was the giant short-faced bear?

The largest males stood 1.67 m at the shoulder and up to about 3.4 m on their hind legs. The average weight is often given as about 625 kg, and estimates for six individuals run from 317 to 957 kg. Males could be twice the size of females.

Was the short-faced bear the biggest bear ever?

No. A South American relative, Arctotherium angustidens, holds that record. An old male from Buenos Aires Province, described in 2011, is estimated at about 1 588 to 1 749 kg, well above the estimates for the North American species.

Did short-faced bears really have short faces?

No. The snout was deep and the nasal bones short, which makes the face look short, but a 2010 study found that it was deeper, not shorter, than in most living bears.

What did the short-faced bear eat?

Plants and varying amounts of meat, like a very large brown bear. Fossil dung from South Dakota and the Yukon holds juniper seeds, and bone chemistry shows some meat. Its teeth do not fit the old idea of a specialised hunter or bone-cracking scavenger.

Did humans live alongside short-faced bears?

Yes. Human and bear trackways appear to cross at White Sands, New Mexico, and at Lubbock Lake in Texas, Clovis people butchered one about 13 000 years ago. There is no clear sign that people caused its extinction.

When did the short-faced bear go extinct?

The most reliable last date is about 12 800 years ago, from Huntington Dam in Utah. It had vanished from Alaska and the Yukon much earlier, about 23 000 years ago on the dates usually quoted, or about 20 000 years ago in a 2025 genetic paper.

Sources

  1. Wikipedia: Arctodus
  2. Wikipedia: Arctotherium
  3. Figueirido et al. (2010), Demythologizing Arctodus simus, the 'short-faced' long-legged and predaceous bear that never was, Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 30, 262–275
  4. National Geographic (2010), The fearsome short-faced bear gets a makeover
  5. Christiansen (1999), What size were Arctodus simus and Ursus spelaeus (Carnivora: Ursidae)?, Annales Zoologici Fennici 36, 93–102
  6. Salis et al. (2025), Genetic diversity, phylogeography, and sexual dimorphism in the extinct giant short-faced bear (Arctodus simus), Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 203, zlaf001
  7. Soibelzon & Schubert (2011), The largest known bear, Arctotherium angustidens, from the early Pleistocene Pampean region of Argentina, Journal of Paleontology 85, 69–75
  8. San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance Library, Extinct short-faced bear (Arctodus spp.): physical characteristics